![]() ![]() As example the Process Chan for BS (Balance Sheet) data load. Our queries will be built on this MultiProvider.Ĭreate now a Process Chain to load “Full” to the History Cube. With a good naming convention you will be able to distinguish the virtual (last digit “A” for Audit) InfoProvider from the others (last digit “H” for History).Īll those InfoProvider will now be combined on the MultiProvider.Īll those InfoProvider will now be combined on the MultiProvider. You see that we have not only one Environment in our Audit reporting, we have 3. Now we are ready to create the Virtual InfoProvider for Audit and normal for History tables. This will be a full Mater data load from the view USER_ADDR table with an own created extract structure. ![]() The next step would be to create the InfoObjects.Īs we like to select per User we will load the User name as attribute to the User ID Infoobject. This need only be done to the Audit Table extractions not to the History as those will be load as Full load into a reporting Cube after the Audit Package did run to put the records older than a day from Audit to History table. On our example we have 8 Models and this will end up to 16 extract structures, each one for Audit and History pro model (see model).Ĭreate now an extract Source for each Audit and History table (TA RSO2).Īs on the reporting we like to be able to report with selections you need to specific the field for the selections (TA RSA6). Now we are ready to create the extract structure for the Data acquisition on SBIW. We will now create now InfoSet Queries for each Audit Table with the Header table UJU_AUDDATAHDR and Archive tables with UJU_AUDDATAHDR_A. This is necessary to limit the data amount on the Audit tables as we will report later direct from those tables. The Data Package to archive the Audit data must run daily, so we do only have an record amount of a day. To implement the solution you need first to know your Audit and History table and to have an Audit table Maintenance strategy on place.Īudit Table are set to one day on the WEB Admin page. The below solution are built on poor BW objects. On a bigger Environment with multiple Millions of Audit records and more than 1000 Users it is nearly not possible to find an input error over the WEB Admin page. If a claimant quit or was terminated from this employer while filing, then a separation decision is adjudicated and may also result in additional overpaid weeks of non-eligibility.Audit Reporting takes long and deliver only approximately 1600 records per selection/request. A determination of 'fraud' may also accompany these findings. The claimant is responsible for the repayment of any UI benefits paid for which there were earnings. Wages determined to have been earned during the same weeks for which UI benefits were claimed are recorded and an overpayment created. Information is matched for any weeks in which UI benefits were claimed and paid. ![]() Employers are sent employment and wage verification requests. The Wage Crossmatch is a quarterly audit that matches earnings reported by Maryland employers with claimants that have filed for and received unemployment insurance during the same calendar quarter. These audits include the Maryland Report of Hire program, the National Directory of New Hire program, the Wage Crossmatch audit and audits instigated via reports of fraud through the Fraud Hotline. The Division of Unemployment Insurance conducts random audits of claimant eligibility.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |